Contrast the views of Europeans of the fifteenth and sixteenth centuries with those of Native Americans and Africans they encountered on such topics as the environment, social relations, religious beliefs, and slavery. Which group do you consider "savage," "heathen," or "barbarian"

Answers

Answer 1
Answer:

Answer:

The views of Europeans of the 15th and 16th centuries with the Native Americans and Africans differ as given below.

Explanation:

The Native American had always considered nature as sacred because their life revolved around the environment. They respect nature and use what is necessary rather than destroying it as the Europeans did. The social relations within the Native American and Africans remained strong. The natives considered themselves as equal while in Africa, clan and family were important. Both had their religion believes, but that was seen as heathen by Europeans as they were not Christians. After concluding, neither the Native American and Africans were savage and barbarian because nothing is comparable to what Europeans did to these people. Europeans were looking for the wealth and land which they got and killed people and introduced slavery to the world by exploiting people who were beneath them.


Related Questions

Who were Spain’s primary European rivals and how did they influence Spanish settlement into Texas?
____________states, such as Nazi Germany, Soviet Russia, and Communist China, were responsible for the murders of 100 million people in the 20th century.
How did 20th century British politics relate to the ongoing Arab-Israeli conflict?A. The British secretly promised to support Israeli control over the city of Jerusalem, but did not recognize that Palestinian Muslims also considered this city their capital and holiest city.B. The British encouraged tension between Arabs and Jews in Palestine to prevent a rebellion against the British, but eventually sided with the Arabs after Israelis began supporting communism.C. The British supported the formation of a Jewish homeland in Palestine during World War I, but strongly opposed it after Arab Palestinians played a major role in the Allied victory in World War II.D. The British promised both Palestinians and Jews an independent homeland in the same part of its Middle Eastern empire, leading both groups to feel that they had a legal right to the territory.
Did, A. Sam Houston or B. Mirabeau Lamar want to prove to mexico that Tx was strong and willing to fight?
What does this map show about the Viking avion It shows that the Vikings salied to North America It shows all the people whom the Vikings conquered It shows the routes that the Vikings and around the It shows the people whom the Vikings encountered​

Delhi sultanate— impact on its society ? Hindu Caste system— Impact on it’s society?

Mughal India— impact on its society ?

Answers

Answer: Delhi Sultanate was the first Muslim State of India.

The Delhi Sultanate was founded in 1206, during the decline of the Persian-born Gurgid dynasty that had conquered the region in northern India. In the wake of the collapse of this empire, the Cumano-Kipchaq Mamluk Qutb-ud-din Aibak, former slave of the last King Gurida, established his kingdom centered in the city of Delhi, from where the sultanate bears the name.

The division of society into caste is determined from heredity. The castes are defined according to the social position that certain Hindu families occupy. Factor that establishes a type of social "hierarchy" marked by privileges and duties.

People who were not part of any of the castes were called outcasts or untouchables. Excluded people who were tasked with doing the most deplorable work, those rejected by individuals in any of the castes.

This system has as its main feature social segregation, determining the role of people within Indian society.

Such segregation results in social inequality, which is explained by the fact that an individual cannot ascend to a higher caste.

The Mughal Empire dominated most of northern India from the sixteenth to the eighteenth centuries. The Mughal rulers practiced the Muslim religion, but most of the population they governed practiced Hinduism. Even so, the Mughals succeeded in their domain. They worked to bring Muslims closer to Hindus in a united India.

Explain ONE aspect of the economic development of China under the Song dynasty that led to the flourishing of commerce that is reflected in the passage.

Answers

Answer:

Agricultural yields were about 2 tan (a unit of about 110 pounds or 50 kilograms) of grain per mu during the Song dynasty, compared with 1 tan during the early Han and 1.5 tan during the late Tang.

Explanation:

Final answer:

A key factor of economic development in the Song Dynasty era was the introduction of paper money. This standardized medium of exchange facilitated trade and the movement of goods and services across the empire.

Explanation:

One significant aspect of the economic development of China under the Song Dynasty that led to the flourishing of commerce was the introduction and spread of paper money. The Song government standardized paper money as a commonly accepted medium of exchange which boosted trade considerably. Before this, transactions were primarily based on the barter system or coinage which were less efficient methods. By this, it also facilitated the movement of goods and services across a vast empire, thereby contributing to the flourishing of commerce. For instance, it became easier for peasant households to engage in the market because of the new currency and their economic activities increased.


Learn more about Song Dynasty's Commerce here:

brainly.com/question/4147455

#SPJ3

The last battle of the war was fought at .

Answers

Answer: Palmito Ranch

Explanation: Robert E. Lee surrendered the last major Confederate army to Ulysses S. Grant at Appomattox Courthouse on April 9, 1865. The last battle was fought at Palmito Ranch, Texas, on May 13, 1865.

Why didn't Octavius name himself king of Rome and not Emporer?

Answers

Answer:

Romans wanted to keep the idea of the Republic and they had an aversion towards monarchic and oligarchic titles. That is why Octavian never proclaimed himself an emperor nor king but got the title of the commandant, the divine son, and first citizen from the Senate.

Explanation:

While we call Octavian Augustus the first Roman emperor today, he never claimed that title himself. His titles included Princeps Civitas, which means First Citizen of the State, and full title Imperator Caesar Divi filius Augustus, but the title of Imperator in Latin would translate to the commandant because it comes from imperare – to order or to command. These titles were given to him by the Senate and he did not claim them himself.

This wasn’t because he was too shy or modest to think of himself as emperor, but because the tiles of king and emperor were connected to ideas of dictatorship in Roman beliefs. Roman people had aversion to the idea of someone having complete, monarch power. This was among things why they have assassinated Caesar in the first place – once he himself thought he was the sole ruler, Roman people have turned against him.

Therefore, while Octavian held the powers of the emperor, he did not claim any of the monarch titles himself as he wanted to keep the illusion of the Republic and democracy.

Which statement best describes the effects of
Japan's Meiji Restoration?

Answers

Answer:

The answer is A, and the next one is C.

Explanation:

A then C

Answer:

Japan modernized its government and economy.

1. why do you think jefferson violated the bill of rights by authorizing unlawful search and seizure?2. why was the embargo act replaced with the non-intercouse act
3. What were some of the effects of the Embargo act?
100 PTS PLEASE HELP NOW!!!!

Answers

Answer:1 As the Fourth Amendment clearly states, law enforcement can enter a home to search or to arrest an individual if they have a warrant based upon probable cause and signed by a neutral and detached magistrate (which is now called a judge).2 This bill became law on May 1, 1810, and replaced the Non-Intercourse Act. It was an acknowledgment of the failure of economic pressure to coerce the European powers. Trade with both Britain and France was now thrown open, and the United States attempted to bargain with the two belligerents. 3 Image result for What were some of the effects of the Embargo act?3 American president Thomas Jefferson (Democratic-‐Republican party) led Congress to pass the Embargo Act of 1807. Effects on American shipping and markets: Agricultural prices and earnings fell. Shipping-related industries were devastated.

Explanation: