In what two ways were Mesopotamia and egypt the same?

Answers

Answer 1
Answer:

Answer: 1. They both grow crops, and use the irrigation system to help water their crops. They also they have a ruler or king of their land.

Answer 2
Answer: Egypt was settled along the Nile River in Egypt.
Mesopotamia was settled between the Tigris and
Euphrates Rivers in the Fertile Crescent. Egyptians
believed in polytheism. ... The people of Mesopotamia
Had advanced irrigation and farming.
Hope this helps
Good luck

Related Questions

How might French citizens felt about the treaty of versailles?
What were 3 ways greek dramas are different to Greek tragedies?
Webster gives two possibilities for the origins or source of our federal government’s power. What are those two sources?
Describe the relationship that existed between the Spaniards and the indigenous people of North America.The relationship between the spainiards and the indigenous is that they don’t like each other if there were a wedding to kill each other they would do it
(blank) are debt certificates that are purchased by an investor.

Which was a main reason for creating the Articles of Confederation? A)to have a unified national government during the Revolutionary War. B)to have a tax system to generate money. C)to outline the role of individual citizens in government. D)to determine the power of states and the federal government.)

Answers

Correct answer choice is:

A) To have a unified national government during the Revolutionary War.

Explanation:

The Continental Congress drafted the Articles of Confederation through the Revolutionary War. The articles were drafted to provide the colonies with some insight of a centralized control. The Articles of Confederation converted valid on March 1, 1781, after all, thirteen states had approved them. They served as the signed paper that set the purposes of the national government of the United States after it announced freedom from Great Britain.

A is correct answer. 

They have to do with unified national government from during the Revolutionary
War.

Hope it helped you.

-Charlie

What happened in no man's land ww1?; What is a stalemate in ww1?; Where did most of the fighting take place in ww1?; Where was ww1 No Man's Land?

Answers

1. By the end of the war, the only things left in the forests were barren tree stumps and shattered logs.

2. The majority of the fighting in Europe took place on the western and eastern fronts.

3. Europe is the place.

4.The lengthy, muddy, treeless area that, during World War I, stood between German and Allied lines

By the end of the war, the only things left in the forests were barren tree stumps and shattered logs. Many European towns had been destroyed. The deaths of more than 2,000,000 German, 1,000,000 British, 1,700,000 Russian, and French soldiers wiped out an entire people.

The majority of the fighting in Europe took place on the western and eastern fronts. The western front was a system of trenches that extended from the Belgian coast to Switzerland. The majority of the World War I fighting took place in France and Belgium along this front, the huge, muddy, treeless plain dividing the Allied and German lines. There were shell holes all over it. No Man's Land was one potential option.

At the beginning of the conflict, phrases like "between the trenches" or "between the lines" were most frequently used to refer to the space between the trench lines.

The lengthy, muddy, treeless area that, during World War I, stood between German and Allied lines. It was littered with innumerable shell holes. No Man's Land provided little to no protection for soldiers, making it extremely risky to be there.

Learn more about ww1 at

brainly.com/question/15216428?referrer=searchResults

#SPJ4

Answer:

No man's land: Literally just mass slaughter Stalemate: Where neither side can advance much Most of the fighting: Europe Where was No Man's Land: Literally between the two trenches where a bunch of barbed wire was

Explanation:

Since no one held No Man's Land, there was a bunch of barbed wire so if you went over the top, good luck maneuvering through artillery, shrapnel, bullets, barbed wire, etc. Stalemate usually happened on the Western Front where neither side could advance much and hundreds of thousands died pointlessly. Where most of the fighting happened? Just Europe, there wasn't much fighting in Asia and the Pacific. Where was No Man's Land? Where no one held the land

Small foreshocks that precede a major earthquake can occur _____.

Answers

Answer:

Days or years before the major earthquake.

Explanation:

The foreshocks always come before the major earthquake. They can appear only a single day before it, weeks, months, or even years. It is a nice indicator that something bigger is coming, so if people are wary enough they can avoid the devastating effects of the major seismic activity afterwards.

For example, we can take the foreshocks and the major earthquake in Ohrid, Republic of Macedonia, in the summer of 2016, where the foreshocks started about two months earlier, and they were present every day for those two months, slightly increasing in intensity, until the major earthquake of 6.9 magnitude according to the Richter scale came.

Glad I could help!!

How did alliances contribute to the start of World War I?

Answers

Secret alliances were formed prior to ww1 so once the conflict started the many alliances kicked in and led to many nations protecting one another

Answer:Secret alliances were formed prior to the outbreak of the war. After the Assassination of Franz Ferdinand the Archduke of Austria-Hungary the alliance systems went into effect leading to many nations protecting one another (i.e. Russia protecting Serbia from Austria-Hungary).

Explanation:

Civil law is different from criminal law because it:A. involves cases that cannot be appealed to higher
courts.
B. only applies to cases in the federal court system.
C. does not involve a person being accused of a crime.
D. deals with both felony and misdemeanor cases.
Help please

Answers

Answer: C. Does not involve a person being accused of a crime.

Explanation: I took the test.

Answer:

C. Does not involve a person being accused of a crime

Explanation:

The correct answer is C.

What nativist fears did Samuel Morse express to the chairman of the Native American Democratic Association? How do such fears lead to intolerance? Do you think nativist organizations are inherently intolerant? Explain.

Answers

Samuel Morse issued warnings about sexual corruption in the Catolic Church arguing that Jesuit priests were undermining American education. He has formed the native American Democratic Association in 1835.  

Even though Morse’s opinions were within the mainstream by the time, his anti-Catholic and anti-immigrant posture lead to intolerance. These views would explode violently in the 1840s, especially in Philadelphia, where the deadly “Bible Riots” of 1844 left dozens dead, Catholic churches in ruins, and hundreds of homes destroyed.

I think nativist organizations are based on narrow religious belief, leading to intolerance against any foreign ideas that can contribute to human evolution.

Final answer:

Samuel Morse expressed nativist fears to the chairman of the Native American Democratic Association, highlighting concerns about immigration's impact on American identity.

Explanation:

In his letter to the chairman of the Native American Democratic Association, Samuel Morse expressed nativist fears about the impact of immigration on American identity and culture. He argued that the influx of foreign immigrants threatened to dilute the traditional values and customs of the United States. Morse believed that nativist organizations were necessary to protect American society from these perceived threats. Such nativist fears can lead to intolerance because they often involve the belief in the superiority of one's own culture or race and the exclusion or mistreatment of others.

Nativists may advocate for restrictive immigration policies, discrimination against marginalized groups, and the suppression of cultural diversity. Intolerance arises when these beliefs and actions deny individuals their rights and dignity. Nativist organizations are not inherently intolerant, but they have the potential to be so. While some nativist groups focus on preserving culture and advocating for stricter immigration controls without promoting intolerance, others may foster an environment of prejudice and discrimination. It depends on the perspectives, goals, and actions of the specific organization.

Learn more about Nativist fears and intolerance here:

brainly.com/question/9086840

#SPJ6