I get the concept of bounties vs airdrops, but there were the few and the proud airdrops, GBYTE being one, the BTX Bitcore was another (if you owned any), and a few others, but I think where bounties were the main focus, I think it was so heavily dev oriented that that is one reason crypto isn’t mainstream, it seems just a myopic view to keep things centered around dev bounties. GBYTE is another example, they didn’t really do much for growing community beyond the airdrop but when it got into bounty, it was so technical only geeks can figure out GBYTE to it’s own detriment. I would think it would be a mistake to focus on simply coding but go more social aspects and use case this go around. Of course airdrops were cool, but not if people from all over will just gobble em up and dump them with no respect to the actual coin, which will happen, so at least with a vesting period (like WAX) has over 3 years, it discourages dumping. WAX needs to be in the PieDAO. I would encourage more business and economics and social aspects this go around, and growing community vs just dev. I think devs may be a very important part of crypto, the bread and butter actually, but they often lack the real world knowledge of business and industry and are missing the boat as a result. A push towards more social, broadcast oriented, discussion - and tracking good ideas to follow through to use cases and new business development should be more of a focus this go around, yet it all does center around coding. I think the teeter totter was one sided in the last go around with dev to the point it hampered society from using it, that and the HODL movement that also caused portfolios to get crushed when the dumping went down. PieDAO could help prove (by variety of PIES, even if in competition / laboratory mode, as it can be historical and graphic and visual and by % gain or loss, by day, week, month, 3 month, 6 month, year and historical) stability or level of risk. I would also encourage more business and industry this go around - in comparison - to such heavy “dev” for asset classes in general - and it should be encouraged to bring in and onboard business and industry, and compare / contrast with other markets, if not work to create asset classes and indexing, be it gold, silver platinum, etc. Why not encourage the discussion of PieDAO vs silver, or PieDAO vs silver/gold index, or PieDAO vs Bitcoin. It’s a proving ground. Go so heavily dev this go around it will miss the boat again and that will just leave big money and investors vs we the people and others. I’d rather see more analysts and creative people this go around and ease of use than developers to be honest with you. More discussion and social aspects will paint a much greater mosaic over time than hard ass coding and a very limited playing field. Like this post got zero thumbs up, it’s not worthy. If it got X amount it should be incentivized, like any other time, energy that offers value. Without and just bounties for the dev, there’s no incentives and that’s where people drop like flies. The people that bring people together as mentioned - other projects, that should be rewarded somehow, or recognized because how is that not as important than hard ass coding?